Unofficial archive — problems, solutions & results © IMC, reproduced with permission.

Studolymp / IMC / 2006

IMC 2006
contestants 241 · problems 12 (6+6) · scale 0–20 · per-problem yes

Per-problem difficulty

Day 1

Day 2

Difficulty vs discrimination

Each dot is one problem. X — how many solved it (scored ≥ 8 of 10); Y — discrimination, i.e. how well the problem told strong contestants from weak ones (score-vs-total correlation).

A good problem sits high and away from the edges. Bottom-left dots separated nobody — almost everyone failed them the same way.

Problem statistics

Same data as the Day 1 / Day 2 charts above. Add diploma cohorts to compare winners against the field.

cohorts:columns:
#difficultyalldisctopics
avgsolvednear-0
Day 1
P1easy9.288%1%0.39real analysis
P2easy7.154%18%0.51number theory
P3hard2.516%64%0.39linear algebranumber theory
P4very hard1.79%69%0.42polynomials
P5very hard1.411%80%0.31inequalitiesreal analysis
P6killer0.31%95%0.18real analysispolynomials
Day 2
P7easy9.288%3%0.35combinatoricsgeometry
P8easy8.276%4%0.41real analysisfunctional equations
P9very hard1.36%68%0.20real analysisinequalities
P10medium3.631%53%0.55linear algebra
P11medium3.835%55%0.53number theorypolynomials
P12killer0.00%99%0.16linear algebra

A diploma-cohort cell needs at least 5 scores, else it shows “—”. How these statistics are computed →