Unofficial archive — problems, solutions & results © IMC, reproduced with permission.

IMC / 2007 / Problems / Day 2, P12

IMC 2007 · Day 2 · P12

killer

Let f≠0f \ne 0 be a polynomial with real coefficients. Define the sequence f0,f1,f2,…f_0, f_1, f_2, \dots of polynomials by f0=ff_0 = f and fn+1=fn+fn′f_{n+1} = f_n + f_n' for every n≥0n \ge 0. Prove that there exists a number NN such that for every n≥Nn \ge N, all roots of fnf_n are real.

Solution (official)

For the proof, we need the following

Lemma 1. For any polynomial gg, denote by d(g)d(g) the minimum distance of any two of its real zeros (d(g)=∞d(g) = \infty if gg has at most one real zero). Assume that gg and g+g′g + g' both are of degree k≥2k \ge 2 and have kk distinct real zeros. Then d(g+g′)≥d(g)d(g + g') \ge d(g).

Proof of Lemma 1: Let x1<x2<⋯<xkx_1 < x_2 < \dots < x_k be the roots of gg. Suppose a,ba, b are roots of g+g′g + g' satisfying 0<b−a<d(g)0 < b - a < d(g). Then, a,ba, b cannot be roots of gg, and g′(a)g(a)=g′(b)g(b)=−1.(1)\tag{1} \frac{g'(a)}{g(a)} = \frac{g'(b)}{g(b)} = -1. Since g′g\frac{g'}{g} is strictly decreasing between consecutive zeros of gg, we must have a<xj<ba < x_j < b for some jj.

For all i=1,2,…,k−1i = 1, 2, \dots, k-1 we have xi+1−xi>b−ax_{i+1} - x_i > b - a, hence a−xi>b−xi+1a - x_i > b - x_{i+1}. If i<ji < j, both sides of this inequality are negative; if i≥ji \ge j, both sides are positive. In any case, 1a−xi<1b−xi+1\frac{1}{a - x_i} < \frac{1}{b - x_{i+1}}, and hence g′(a)g(a)=∑i=1k−11a−xi+1a−xk⏟<0<∑i=1k−11b−xi+1+1b−x1⏟>0=g′(b)g(b)\frac{g'(a)}{g(a)} = \sum_{i=1}^{k-1} \frac{1}{a - x_i} + \underbrace{\frac{1}{a - x_k}}_{< 0} < \sum_{i=1}^{k-1} \frac{1}{b - x_{i+1}} + \underbrace{\frac{1}{b - x_1}}_{> 0} = \frac{g'(b)}{g(b)} This contradicts (1).

Now we turn to the proof of the stated problem. Denote by mm the degree of ff. We will prove by induction on mm that fnf_n has mm distinct real zeros for sufficiently large nn. The cases m=0,1m = 0, 1 are trivial; so we assume m≥2m \ge 2. Without loss of generality we can assume that ff is monic. By induction, the result holds for f′f', and by ignoring the first few terms we can assume that fn′f_n' has m−1m - 1 distinct real zeros for all nn. Let us denote these zeros by x1(n)>x2(n)>⋯>xm−1(n)x_1^{(n)} > x_2^{(n)} > \dots > x_{m-1}^{(n)}. Then fnf_n has minima in x1(n),x3(n),x5(n),…x_1^{(n)}, x_3^{(n)}, x_5^{(n)}, \dots, and maxima in x2(n),x4(n),x6(n),…x_2^{(n)}, x_4^{(n)}, x_6^{(n)}, \dots. Note that in the interval (xi+1(n),xi(n))(x_{i+1}^{(n)}, x_i^{(n)}), the function fn+1′=fn′+fn′′f_{n+1}' = f_n' + f_n'' must have a zero (this follows by applying Rolle's theorem to the function exfn′(x)e^x f_n'(x)); the same is true for the interval (−∞,xm−1(n))(-\infty, x_{m-1}^{(n)}). Hence, in each of these m−1m - 1 intervals, fn+1′f_{n+1}' has exactly one zero. This shows that x1(n)>x1(n+1)>x2(n)>x2(n+1)>x3(n)>x3(n+1)>…(2)\tag{2} x_1^{(n)} > x_1^{(n+1)} > x_2^{(n)} > x_2^{(n+1)} > x_3^{(n)} > x_3^{(n+1)} > \dots

Lemma 2. We have lim⁡n→∞fn(xj(n))=−∞\lim\limits_{n \to \infty} f_n(x_j^{(n)}) = -\infty if jj is odd, and lim⁡n→∞fn(xj(n))=+∞\lim\limits_{n \to \infty} f_n(x_j^{(n)}) = +\infty if jj is even.

Lemma 2 immediately implies the result: For sufficiently large nn, the values of all maxima of fnf_n are positive, and the values of all minima of fnf_n are negative; this implies that fnf_n has mm distinct zeros.

Proof of Lemma 2: Let d=min⁡{d(f′),1}d = \min \{ d(f'), 1 \}; then by Lemma 1, d(fn′)≥dd(f_n') \ge d for all nn. Define ε=(m−1)dm−1mm−1\varepsilon = \frac{(m-1) d^{m-1}}{m^{m-1}}; we will show that fn+1(xj(n+1))≥fn(xj(n))+εfor j even.(3)\tag{3} f_{n+1}(x_j^{(n+1)}) \ge f_n(x_j^{(n)}) + \varepsilon \quad \text{for } j \text{ even.} (The corresponding result for odd jj can be shown similarly.) Do to so, write f=fnf = f_n, b=xj(n)b = x_j^{(n)}, and choose aa satisfying d≤b−a≤1d \le b - a \le 1 such that f′f' has no zero inside (a,b)(a, b). Define ξ\xi by the relation b−ξ=1m(b−a)b - \xi = \frac{1}{m}(b - a); then ξ∈(a,b)\xi \in (a, b). We show that f(ξ)+f′(ξ)≥f(b)+εf(\xi) + f'(\xi) \ge f(b) + \varepsilon.

Notice, that f′′(ξ)f′(ξ)=∑i=1m−11ξ−xi(n)=∑i<j1ξ−xi(n)⏟<1ξ−a+1ξ−b+∑i>j1ξ−xi(n)⏟<0<(m−1)1ξ−a+1ξ−b=0.\begin{align*} \frac{f''(\xi)}{f'(\xi)} &= \sum_{i=1}^{m-1} \frac{1}{\xi - x_i^{(n)}} \\ &= \underbrace{\sum_{i<j} \frac{1}{\xi - x_i^{(n)}}}_{< \frac{1}{\xi - a}} + \frac{1}{\xi - b} + \underbrace{\sum_{i>j} \frac{1}{\xi - x_i^{(n)}}}_{< 0} \\ &< (m-1) \frac{1}{\xi - a} + \frac{1}{\xi - b} = 0. \end{align*} The last equality holds by definition of ξ\xi. Since f′f' is positive and f′′f′\frac{f''}{f'} is decreasing in (a,b)(a, b), we have that f′′f'' is negative on (ξ,b)(\xi, b). Therefore, f(b)−f(ξ)=∫ξbf′(t) dt≤∫ξbf′(ξ) dt=(b−ξ)f′(ξ)f(b) - f(\xi) = \int_{\xi}^{b} f'(t)\,dt \le \int_{\xi}^{b} f'(\xi)\,dt = (b - \xi) f'(\xi) Hence, f(ξ)+f′(ξ)≥f(b)−(b−ξ)f′(ξ)+f′(ξ)=f(b)+(1−(ξ−b))f′(ξ)=f(b)+(1−1m(b−a))f′(ξ)≥f(b)+(1−1m)f′(ξ).\begin{align*} f(\xi) + f'(\xi) &\ge f(b) - (b - \xi) f'(\xi) + f'(\xi) \\ &= f(b) + (1 - (\xi - b)) f'(\xi)

\\ &= f(b) + \left( 1 - \tfrac{1}{m}(b - a) \right) f'(\xi) \\ &\ge f(b) + \left( 1 - \tfrac{1}{m} \right) f'(\xi). \end{align*} Together with f′(ξ)=∣f′(ξ)∣=m∏i=1m−1∣ξ−xi(n)∣⏟≥∣ξ−b∣≥m∣ξ−b∣m−1≥dm−1mm−2f'(\xi) = |f'(\xi)| = m \prod_{i=1}^{m-1} \underbrace{\left| \xi - x_i^{(n)} \right|}_{\ge |\xi - b|} \ge m |\xi - b|^{m-1} \ge \frac{d^{m-1}}{m^{m-2}} we get f(ξ)+f′(ξ)≥f(b)+ε.f(\xi) + f'(\xi) \ge f(b) + \varepsilon. Together with (2) this shows (3). This finishes the proof of Lemma 2.

How the field did

contestants scored
242
average (of 20)
0.25
solved (≥ 80%)
0.0%
near-0 (≤ 10%)
98.8%
discrimination
0.36

Score distribution (field cohort)

Computed on contestants with a meaningful total (field cohort); discrimination is the corrected item–total correlation.

Similar problems

IMC 2006 · Day 1 · P6killeravg 0.3/10 · solved 1% · near-0 95% · disc 0.18
IMC 2017 · Day 2 · P7very hardavg 1.6/10 · solved 14% · near-0 83% · disc 0.44
IMC 2014 · Day 1 · P3mediumavg 4.2/10 · solved 40% · near-0 54% · disc 0.53