Unofficial archive — problems, solutions & results © IMC, reproduced with permission.

IMC / 2004 / Problems / Day 1, P5

IMC 2004 · Day 1 · P5

killer
combinatoricsworth 20 pts

Let XX be a set of (2k−4k−2)+1\binom{2k-4}{k-2} + 1 real numbers, k≥2k \ge 2. Prove that there exists a monotone sequence {xi}i=1k⊆X\{x_i\}_{i=1}^{k} \subseteq X such that ∣xi+1−x1∣≥2∣xi−x1∣|x_{i+1} - x_1| \ge 2 |x_i - x_1| for all i=2,…,k−1i = 2, \dots, k-1.

Solution (official)

We prove a more general statement:

Lemma. Let k,l≥2k, l \ge 2, let XX be a set of (k+l−4k−2)+1\binom{k+l-4}{k-2} + 1 real numbers. Then either XX contains an increasing sequence {xi}i=1k⊆X\{x_i\}_{i=1}^{k} \subseteq X of length kk and ∣xi+1−x1∣≥2∣xi−x1∣∀i=2,…,k−1,|x_{i+1} - x_1| \ge 2 |x_i - x_1| \quad \forall i = 2, \dots, k-1, or XX contains a decreasing sequence {xi}i=1l⊆X\{x_i\}_{i=1}^{l} \subseteq X of length ll and ∣xi+1−x1∣≥2∣xi−x1∣∀i=2,…,l−1.|x_{i+1} - x_1| \ge 2 |x_i - x_1| \quad \forall i = 2, \dots, l-1.

Proof of the lemma. We use induction on k+lk + l. In case k=2k = 2 or l=2l = 2 the lemma is obviously true.

Now let us make the induction step. Let mm be the minimal element of XX, MM be its maximal element. Let Xm={x∈X:x≤m+M2},XM={x∈X:x>m+M2}.X_m = \left\{ x \in X : x \le \frac{m+M}{2} \right\}, \qquad X_M = \left\{ x \in X : x > \frac{m+M}{2} \right\}. Since (k+l−4k−2)=(k+(l−1)−4k−2)+((k−1)+l−4(k−1)−2)\binom{k+l-4}{k-2} = \binom{k+(l-1)-4}{k-2} + \binom{(k-1)+l-4}{(k-1)-2}, we can see that either ∣Xm∣≥((k−1)+l−4(k−1)−2)+1,or∣XM∣≥(k+(l−1)−4k−2)+1.|X_m| \ge \binom{(k-1)+l-4}{(k-1)-2} + 1, \quad \text{or} \quad |X_M| \ge \binom{k+(l-1)-4}{k-2} + 1. In the first case we apply the inductive assumption to XmX_m and either obtain a decreasing sequence of length ll with the required properties (in this case the inductive step is made), or obtain an increasing sequence {xi}i=1k−1⊆Xm\{x_i\}_{i=1}^{k-1} \subseteq X_m of length k−1k-1. Then we note that the sequence {x1,x2,…,xk−1,M}⊆X\{x_1, x_2, \dots, x_{k-1}, M\} \subseteq X has length kk and all the required properties.

In the case ∣XM∣≥(k+(l−1)−4k−2)+1|X_M| \ge \binom{k+(l-1)-4}{k-2} + 1 the inductive step is made in a similar way. Thus the lemma is proved.

The reader may check that the number (k+l−4k−2)+1\binom{k+l-4}{k-2} + 1 cannot be smaller in the lemma.

How the field did

contestants scored
176
average (of 20)
1.19
solved (≥ 80%)
4.0%
near-0 (≤ 10%)
92.6%
discrimination
0.29

Score distribution (field cohort)

Computed on contestants with a meaningful total (field cohort); discrimination is the corrected item–total correlation.

Similar problems

IMC 2014 · Day 2 · P9killeravg 0.6/10 · solved 4% · near-0 89% · disc 0.40
IMC 2025 · Day 1 · P5killeravg 1.0/10 · solved 5% · near-0 79% · disc 0.49
IMC 2016 · Day 2 · P9killeravg 0.7/10 · solved 3% · near-0 92% · disc 0.40
IMC 2014 · Day 1 · P5very hardavg 1.0/10 · solved 5% · near-0 78% · disc 0.49