Unofficial archive — problems, solutions & results © IMC, reproduced with permission.

IMC / 2002 / Problems / Day 2, P12

IMC 2002 · Day 2 · P12

killer

Let f:Rn→Rf : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R} be a convex function whose gradient ∇f=(∂f∂x1,…,∂f∂xn)\nabla f = \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_1}, \dots, \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_n} \right) exists at every point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n and satisfies the condition ∃L>0 ∀x1,x2∈Rn∥∇f(x1)−∇f(x2)∥≤L∥x1−x2∥.\exists L > 0\ \forall x_1, x_2 \in \mathbb{R}^n\quad \|\nabla f(x_1) - \nabla f(x_2)\| \le L \|x_1 - x_2\|. Prove that ∀x1,x2∈Rn∥∇f(x1)−∇f(x2)∥2≤L⟨∇f(x1)−∇f(x2), x1−x2⟩.(1)\tag{1} \forall x_1, x_2 \in \mathbb{R}^n\quad \|\nabla f(x_1) - \nabla f(x_2)\|^2 \le L \langle \nabla f(x_1) - \nabla f(x_2),\ x_1 - x_2 \rangle. In this formula ⟨a,b⟩\langle a, b \rangle denotes the scalar product of the vectors aa and bb.

Solution (official)

Let g(x)=f(x)−f(x1)−⟨∇f(x1),x−x1⟩g(x) = f(x) - f(x_1) - \langle \nabla f(x_1), x - x_1 \rangle. It is obvious that gg has the same properties. Moreover, g(x1)=∇g(x1)=0g(x_1) = \nabla g(x_1) = 0 and, due to convexity, gg has 0 as the absolute minimum at x1x_1. Next we prove that g(x2)≥12L∥∇g(x2)∥2.(2)\tag{2} g(x_2) \ge \frac{1}{2L} \|\nabla g(x_2)\|^2. Let y0=x2−1L∥∇g(x2)∥y_0 = x_2 - \frac{1}{L} \|\nabla g(x_2)\|

and y(t)=y0+t(x2−y0)y(t) = y_0 + t (x_2 - y_0). Then g(x2)=g(y0)+∫01⟨∇g(y(t)), x2−y0⟩ dt==g(y0)+⟨∇g(x2), x2−y0⟩−∫01⟨∇g(x2)−∇g(y(t)), x2−y0⟩ dt≥≥0+1L∥∇g(x2)∥2−∫01∥∇g(x2)−∇g(y(t))∥⋅∥x2−y0∥ dt≥≥1L∥∇g(x2)∥2−∥x2−y0∥∫01L∥x2−y(t)∥ dt==1L∥∇g(x2)∥2−L∥x2−y0∥2∫01t dt=12L∥∇g(x2)∥2.\begin{align*} g(x_2) &= g(y_0) + \int_0^1 \langle \nabla g(y(t)),\ x_2 - y_0 \rangle\,dt = \\ &= g(y_0) + \langle \nabla g(x_2),\ x_2 - y_0 \rangle - \int_0^1 \langle \nabla g(x_2) - \nabla g(y(t)),\ x_2 - y_0 \rangle\,dt \ge \\ &\ge 0 + \frac{1}{L} \|\nabla g(x_2)\|^2 - \int_0^1 \|\nabla g(x_2) - \nabla g(y(t))\| \cdot \|x_2 - y_0\|\,dt \ge \\ &\ge \frac{1}{L} \|\nabla g(x_2)\|^2 - \|x_2 - y_0\| \int_0^1 L \|x_2 - y(t)\|\,dt = \\ &= \frac{1}{L} \|\nabla g(x_2)\|^2 - L \|x_2 - y_0\|^2 \int_0^1 t\,dt = \frac{1}{2L} \|\nabla g(x_2)\|^2. \end{align*} Substituting the definition of gg into (2), we obtain f(x2)−f(x1)−⟨∇f(x1), x2−x1⟩≥12L∥∇f(x2)−∇f(x1)∥2,f(x_2) - f(x_1) - \langle \nabla f(x_1),\ x_2 - x_1 \rangle \ge \frac{1}{2L} \|\nabla f(x_2) - \nabla f(x_1)\|^2, ∥∇f(x2)−∇f(x1)∥2≤2L⟨∇f(x1), x1−x2⟩+2L(f(x2)−f(x1)).(3)\tag{3} \|\nabla f(x_2) - \nabla f(x_1)\|^2 \le 2L \langle \nabla f(x_1),\ x_1 - x_2 \rangle + 2L (f(x_2) - f(x_1)). Exchanging variables x1x_1 and x2x_2, we have ∥∇f(x2)−∇f(x1)∥2≤2L⟨∇f(x2), x2−x1⟩+2L(f(x1)−f(x2)).(4)\tag{4} \|\nabla f(x_2) - \nabla f(x_1)\|^2 \le 2L \langle \nabla f(x_2),\ x_2 - x_1 \rangle + 2L (f(x_1) - f(x_2)). The statement (1) is the average of (3) and (4).

How the field did

contestants scored
182
average (of 20)
0.18
solved (≥ 80%)
0.0%
near-0 (≤ 10%)
98.9%
discrimination
0.16

Score distribution (field cohort)

Computed on contestants with a meaningful total (field cohort); discrimination is the corrected item–total correlation.

Similar problems

IMC 1999 · Day 1 · P6killeravg 0.1/10 · solved 0% · near-0 97% · disc 0.22
IMC 2001 · Day 2 · P12killeravg 0.5/10 · solved 4% · near-0 94% · disc 0.13
IMC 2006 · Day 2 · P9very hardavg 1.3/10 · solved 6% · near-0 68% · disc 0.20
IMC 2006 · Day 1 · P5very hardavg 1.4/10 · solved 11% · near-0 80% · disc 0.31